The origin of the name “Turtle Mountain” has never been definitely explained.
Between 1810 and 1870, Métis hunters from the Red River area followed trails north and south of the feature, to reach the buffalo herds. When viewed from the south, the upland appeared to the Métis as a turtle on the horizon with the head pointing westward and the tail to the east. Another account says that the feature was named for an Ojibwa Indian, “Makinak,” (turtle) who walked (ran?) its entire length in one day. The Ojibwa often took their names from things in nature, and the turtle was an important figure in their religious tradition. Other names that have referred to Turtle Mountain include Makinak Wudjiw, LaMontagne Torchue (French for ‘Turtle Mountain’), Turtle Hill, Beckoning Hills, and the Blue Jewel of the Plain.
Still another possible origin for the name might be the painted turtles, which are plentiful in the area today. The only “semi-official” information I could find that referred to the origin of the name was included in the early accounts of government cartographers, who noted that, from a distance, the profile of the plateau resembles the back of a turtle. Patrick Gourneau, in his book History of the Turtle Mountain Chippewa explained why “Turtle Mountain” is not “Turtle Mountains.” He states the following: “The naming of Turtle Mountain goes back a long time, versions from white men and Indians. To mention only three Chippeway versions, it indicates that it was the early Chippeway migrants from the woodlands of the east who named it Turtle Mountain. None of the three versions carry the name Turtle Mountains. As far back as my memory goes, I have not ever heard a full blood term the hills as Turtle Mountains, and same applies to the “Mechifs.” The Chippeway name is “Mekinauk Wudjiw” (Turtle Mountain). If it was Turtle Mountains it would be “Mekinauk Wudjiw wum” (plural). The “Mechifs” referred to the hills as “La Montagne Torchue.” “La Montagne Torchue” is French meaning Turtle Mountain. — quoted in Trail of Misgivings by Daniel F. Jerome, 2006, 280 p.
The name “Turtle Mountain” has been misused for so long, that it has become common practice to use the plural or the singular interchangeably to designate the area. I will use the singular form in this article.
For many people, mention of Turtle Mountain brings to mind the International Peace Garden, which straddles an area of three and a half square miles on the U.S.- Canada (North Dakota – Manitoba) border. North Dakota, after all, is known as the Peace Garden State. The Peace Garden was established in 1932 as a symbol of the peaceful relationship between the two nations. The North Dakota portion of the Peace Garden is in Rolette County on the west side of U.S. Highway 281.
Turtle Mountain rises 600 to 800 feet above its surroundings, high enough to receive significantly more precipitation than the surrounding grassland. As a result of the heavier precipitation, Turtle Mountain is forested. The hills cover an area of about a thousand square miles, half in North Dakota, and half in Manitoba. Along with river bottom land and the forested Pembina Hills to the east, Turtle Mountain is one of the few extensive wooded areas in the region. The predominant covering of aspen is interspersed with black poplar, ash, birch, box elder, elm, and bur oak. A large part of the vegetation consists of shrubs like hazel, chokecherry, saskatoon, nanny berry, dogwood, highbush cranberry (pembina), and pincherry. Fire played an important role in the development of present-day vegetation. Prior to settlement, Turtle Mountain was periodically swept by fire caused by lightning and by human activity. Plains Indians recognized that a heavy growth of new plants appeared in burned areas. They knew too that forests did not attract bison, an important food source, so they routinely set fire to the wooded areas. Prairie winds then carried the fires for many miles. This practice may represent one of the earlier attempts by humans to attract animals by manipulating the environment.
Turtle Mountain is basically an erosional feature, a broad area, resulting when younger sediments were left standing when the surrounding older materials were eroded away. Unlike the Killdeers, though, Turtle Mountain was then glaciated and the resulting glacial landforms greatly changed the area. Had the area not been glaciated, Turtle Mountain might be more like the Killdeer Mountains, although much broader and probably not so prominent a feature. The area of Turtle Mountain is underlain by rocks of the Cretaceous Fox Hills and Hell Creek formations and the Paleocene Cannonball Formation, all covered by a thick layer of glacial sediment. In early Pliocene or earliest Miocene time, five or six million years ago, the area that is now Turtle Mountain was part of a broad, northeast-sloping plain. Rivers and streams flowed over the plain from the west and southwest, making their way to Hudson Bay. Then, in Pliocene time, maybe four million years ago, erosion increased markedly and large amounts of material were removed as deep valleys dissected the plain. I am unsure why this cycle of erosion began. Perhaps the area was uplifted by geologic forces so that streams began to cut down and into the sediments over which they had been flowing or (more likely) the climate may have changed.
The erosion removed sediment and shaped new hills and valleys. Gradually, as streams carried the sediments surrounding Turtle Mountain away to Hudson Bay, a large mesa, or perhaps a range of buttes, remained where the hills that comprise Turtle Mountain stand today. The reason the outlier developed where it did is not clear. The uppermost bedrock unit (beneath the covering of glacial sediment) of Turtle Mountain is the Tertiary Cannonball Formation, which is not notably resistant to erosion. It is possible that some kind of resistant layer was present throughout much of the erosion cycle, perhaps a part of the lower Bullion Creek Formation. Additional drilling in the area may eventually penetrate a remnant of some resistant material that has not yet been found. If any resistant layer exists, it is everywhere buried beneath glacial sediments.
About three million years ago, the climate turned colder and, as snow built up to great depths near Hudson Bay, glaciers formed and the ice flowed southward, out of Canada into North Dakota. As the climate fluctuated during the Ice Age, glaciers advanced and receded, flowing over and around Turtle Mountain several times. About 25,000 years ago, the Late Wisconsinan glacier flowed southward over Turtle Mountain for the last time. During the most recent major glaciation, Turtle Mountain was continuously buried beneath the actively moving glacial ice for about 10,000 years.
The movement of the glacial ice over the obstruction formed by the Turtle Mountain upland caused the ice to become compressed, resulting in shearing within the glacier, especially on the west and north sides of the area. The shearing of the ice at the edge of Turtle Mountain caused large amounts of rock and sediment to be incorporated into the ice. As the climate moderated between 15,000 and 13,000 years ago, the glacier became thinner and its margin receded northward. Because Turtle Mountain rises 600 to 800 feet above the surrounding area, and because ice 200 or 300 feet thick can flow under its own weight, the flow of glacial ice on the lowland adjacent to Turtle Mountain continued for a while. At the same time, the glacier on top of Turtle Mountain stagnated, leaving several hundred feet of debris-covered ice covering the surface on the upland.
In areas surrounding Turtle Mountain, where shearing of material into the glacier had not been as intense, the ice was cleaner and it simply melted away, leaving only a small amount of sediment. In contrast, as the debris-covered stagnant ice over Turtle Mountain melted, the debris it contained gradually became concentrated at the surface of the ice, resulting in an increasingly thick insulating layer that greatly retarded the rate of melting. Thus, even though the glacier had stopped flowing, and had stagnated over the Turtle Mountain upland by 13,000 years ago, the layer of insulation that built up on top of the stagnant glacier kept it from completely melting for another 3,000 years. It was not until about 10,000 years ago that the last glacial ice on Turtle Mountain melted.
The glacial sediment on the stagnant glacier covering the Turtle Mountain upland was irregularly distributed and, for this reason, the ice there melted unevenly. This uneven melting caused the upper surface of the stagnant ice to become hilly and pitted with irregular depressions. The glacial sediment on and within the ice was saturated with water from the melting ice and it was highly fluid. It slid down the ice slopes in the form of mud flows and filled the depressions. Thick accumulations of debris in depressions on the stagnant glacier insulated the ice beneath, keeping it from melting quickly. Newly exposed ice, from which the insulating debris cover had recently slid, melted rapidly. The result was a continual reshaping of the surface of the stagnant, sediment-covered glacier.
The environment over Turtle Mountain gradually stabilized and the lakes flooding the sediment-lined depressions on the stagnant glacier became more temperate. Most of the water in the lakes came from local precipitation, rather than from melting ice. Precipitation at the time was greater than it is today; probably more than 50 inches a year, and the mean annual temperature was a few degrees cooler than it is today. Eventually, all the stagnant ice over Turtle Mountain melted, and all of the material that had been on top of and within the glacier was distributed in its current position, forming the hilly “collapse” topography found in the area today. These landforms are referred to by geologists as “hummocky collapsed glacial topography,” or “dead-ice moraine.” The modern landscape on Turtle Mountain is characterized by hundreds of lakes and ponds, by hummocky topography, and also by some broad, flat areas that stand well above the surrounding rougher land, along with some flat, lowland areas. Many of the higher flat areas are old lake plains, underlain by silt and clay that were once surrounded by glacial ice. These areas are referred to as “elevated lake plains.” Some of the lower flat areas are covered by stream deposits of gravel and sand. No streams flow for any great distance throughout the area.
Geologists tend to concoct unusual names for the things they study. “Dead-ice moraine” may sound odd to some of you. It’s a name for a kind of landform found in parts of North Dakota. Dead-ice moraine sounds odd enough, but can you believe it is found along with things called “doughnuts” and “puckered lips”? First of all, the word “moraine” is an 18th century French word. It was coined by Horace de Saussure to refer to “a heap of earth or stony debris” (de Saussure did not initially realize he was referring to glacial deposits). I’ll explain the “dead” part of dead-ice moraine later.
Dead-ice moraine is also referred to as “hummocky collapsed glacial topography” or “stagnation moraine.” It has irregular topography, formed as the last glaciers were melting at the end of the Ice Age, between about 12,000 and 9,000 years ago. The most extensive area of dead-ice moraine in North Dakota is found on the Missouri Coteau, which extends from the northwest corner to the south-central part of the state (coteau is French for “little hill”) Other extensive areas of dead-ice moraine are Turtle Mountain in north-central North Dakota and the Prairie Coteau in the southeast corner of the state near Lidgerwood. All three areas are uplands that stand above the nearby lower land. The landforms on Turtle Mountain are identical to those on the Missouri Coteau and Prairie Coteau, but Turtle Mountain has a woodland cover, the result of several inches more annual precipitation than the other areas.
North Dakota’s areas of dead-ice moraine generally make for poor farmland as they are rough and bouldery. They do, however, include a lot of excellent rangeland and thousands of depressions, which may contain lakes, ponds, and sloughs known as prairie potholes . The dead-ice moraine of the Missouri Coteau is known as the prairie-pothole region (the so-called North Dakota “duck factory”). The dead-ice moraine is essentially undrained, except locally. No rivers or streams flow for any appreciable distance in any of the three dead-ice regions – Turtle Mountain, the Missouri Coteau, or the Prairie Coteau. Dead-ice moraine formed when glaciers advanced against and over steep escarpments as they flowed onto the three upland areas. The land rises as much as 650 feet in little more than a mile along parts of the Missouri Escarpment, which marks the eastern and northeastern edge of the Missouri Coteau. Similar prominent escarpments border the Prairie Coteau and Turtle Mountain in North Dakota and Manitoba, especially the west side of Turtle Mountain near Carbury. When the glaciers advanced over these escarpments, the internal stress resulted in shearing in the ice. The shearing brought large amounts of rock and sediment from beneath the glacier into the ice and to its surface.
Eventually, as the Ice Age climate moderated, the glaciers became thinner and could no longer flow over higher land, although they kept flowing through lower areas. When the ice on the uplands became detached from still-flowing ice, the glaciers on the uplands stopped advancing and stagnated (or “died”). As the stagnant glacial ice melted, large amounts of sediment that had been dispersed through the ice gradually accumulated on top of the ice, which was several hundred feet thick. The thick covering of sediment on the stagnant glacier helped to insulate the underlying ice, helping to preserve it and prolonging the time it took to melt. As a result, it took several thousand years for the ice to melt. Geologists have determined that insulated, stagnant glacial ice continued to exist on the Turtle Mountain and Missouri Coteau uplands until about 9,000 years ago, nearly 3,000 years after actively moving glaciers had disappeared from North Dakota.
In places where the debris on top of the ice was thickest, the glacier was slowest to melt. If little or no insulating debris covered the glacial ice, melting was quicker and the ice had entirely melted away by 12,000 years ago.
As the stagnant ice on the uplands slowly melted, the glacier surface became more and more irregular. The soupy debris on top of the ice continually slumped and slid, flowing into lower areas, eventually shaping the hummocky, collapsed glacial topography – dead-ice moraine – found today over the uplands. As the stagnant glacial ice melted, and debris slid from higher to lower places, a variety of unusual features resulted. Long ridges formed when sediment slid into cracks in the ice. Such ridges may be straight or irregular, depending on the shape of the cracks. Often, cracks that formed in a rectilinear pattern when the glacial ice was disintegrating, became partly filled with debris that slid into them. Today, we see nearly straight, intersecting ridges, where the ice cracks had been. These ridges are called “disintegration ridges.” Mounds of material collected in holes and depressions in the ice. If the mounds were cored by ice, when the ice cores melted, the centers of the mounds collapsed, forming circular-shaped ridges – “doughnuts.” Some of the doughnuts are breached on two sides because the debris cover on a mound of ice slid off two sides of the mound. Some geologists have referred to such features as “puckered lips.” Wherever part of the covering of debris slid off an area of ice to a lower place, the newly exposed ice then melted more quickly transforming what had been a hill into a hole or depression. Such reversals of topography continued until all the ice had eventually melted.
The insulating blanket of debris on top of a stagnant glacier was so thick in places that the cold temperatures of the ice had little or no effect on the surface of the ground. Trees, grasses, and animals lived on the land surface overlying the stagnant glacial ice. As conditions gradually stabilized, water collected in lakes in depressions on the debris-covered glacial ice. Most of the water in the lakes was probably the result of local precipitation rather than from melting ice. Precipitation at the time was greater than it is today, probably 50 or 75 or more inches of rainfall a year. The mean annual temperature was only a few degrees cooler than it is today.
Surrounding the ponds and lakes, the debris on top of a stagnant glacier was forested by spruce, tamarack, birch, and poplar, as well as aquatic mosses and other vegetation, much like parts of northern Minnesota today. This stagnant-ice environment in North Dakota, 10,000 years ago, was in many ways similar to stagnant, sediment-covered glaciers in parts of Alaska today. Fish, clams, and other animals and plants thrived in the numerous lakes. Wooly mammoths, bear, caribou, wapiti, and other large game roamed the broad areas of forested, debris-covered ice.
During the years I was mapping North Dakota geology, I occasionally came across Ice Age fossils in North Dakota’s dead-ice moraine: caribou bones, mammoth teeth, fossil fish (mainly perch), and various kinds of snails, but paleontologists studying the Ice Age fauna and flora in detail have found many more kinds of Ice Age fossils than I noticed.
Prehistoric people probably lived on the insulated glaciers in North Dakota 10,000 years ago without realizing the ice lay only a few feet below. Or, if they did realize it, they likely accepted it as a normal situation (and I suppose it was normal for that time). Eventually, all the buried ice melted, and all the materials on top of the glacier were lowered to their present position, resulting in the hilly areas of dead-ice moraine we see today.
Every summer, even during the coldest part of the Ice Age, some melting took place on a glacier’s surface and along its margin. Melting occurred during each summer season – even more when the climate warmed for periods of several years at a time – 20 or 30 years – periods of time comparable to the kinds of swings we see in North Dakota’s climate today. The farther south the glacier advanced, into more temperate zones, the more the amount of melting challenged the health of the glacier in those areas until a balance was finally struck between 1) the rate at which the glacial was ice advancing, 2) warmer climates to the south, and 3) overall climate warming due to the approaching end of the Ice Age. Gradually, the balance among these three factors shifted farther north (and east) and ice began to disappear in those parts of North Dakota that were glaciated.
The position of the edge of an ice sheet at any given time was determined by the balance between melting and the rate at which the glacier was flowing. While the climate remained cold (at average annual temperatures below freezing), a continental ice mass became thicker and the edge of a glacier advanced. When it warmed a little, perhaps with average temperatures a bit cooler than those we have now, the glacier margin melted back about as fast as new ice could be supplied. Even though the glacier was moving, its edge neither advanced nor receded (but melting was taking place on the glacier surface). Given still warmer conditions, the surface of a glacier melted more rapidly; the ice thinned, and the glacier’s edge melted back faster than new ice was being supplied. Areas the ice had covered gradually became deglaciated.
As the margin of a glacier melted, debris that had been frozen into the ice many miles to the north was freed and deposited on the ground. This “glacial sediment” consisted of a blended sampling of the various kinds of rock and sediment over which the glacier had flowed. Glaciers advancing into North Dakota from the northeast deposited mainly sandy, granite-rich materials they had picked up as they flowed over the Precambrian rocks of northwest Ontario. Ice coming from the northwest brought a mixture of sandy and clayey materials it had accumulated as it flowed over broad expanses of Cretaceous shale and Tertiary sands of southern Alberta and Saskatchewan. Ice advancing straight southward from Manitoba, up the Red River Valley, deposited carbonate-rich sediment it had picked up north of Winnipeg where Paleozoic limestone and dolostone are exposed today. If you travel north of Winnipeg to Stony Mountain or Stonewall, Manitoba, be sure to notice the quarries, now producing some of the same materials that glaciers brought to North Dakota, perhaps 17,000 years ago. Studying the composition of the glacial sediment is one way that geologists can determine the direction from which the ice came, and the kind of land it flowed over.
Eventually, as each glacier melted (North Dakota was probably glaciated between 10 and 20 times during the past three million years), the land gradually became free of ice. No reversal of ice flow is involved when the glacier recedes; I emphasize that “retreat” of a glacier refers to the melting of the ice. Three different kinds of ice wasting occurred, at different times and places in North Dakota. The first occurred when the glacier margin may have been far to the south, in Iowa and South Dakota. The result of melting, perhaps over a period of relative warmth of hundreds or thousands of years, resulted in the loss of much of the ice mass off the glacier’s surface. The “view from above” in North Dakota would not have changed much – everything was still all ice – but the thickness of glacial ice covering the land was diminished in thickness by hundreds or thousands of feet, even before the glacier margin had receded into North Dakota.
The second way a glacier wasted (at least from our North Dakota perspective) was when the ice margin was nearby. When that happened, wasting involved frequent change in the position of the edge of the active glacier. As a glacier melted, and after it had become thinner, its active margin gradually receded because the volume of ice arriving was insufficient to replace the ice lost at the edge due to melting. Shrinkage of this kind caused the ice margin to melt back, sometimes in a step-like fashion, the flow of ice pausing long enough at times for the forward movement of the glacier to deliver piles of sediment (moraines) to the receding ice margin. A year of glacial activity might involve the margin moving forward a short distance during a winter; then, during the following summer, the margin receding a slightly greater distance. During this phase, one of the most important things taking place, at least during summer seasons, was the deposition of large amounts of gravel and sand being deposited in front of the glacier by water flowing from the melting, sediment-laden ice. The net effect of this second phase of glacial melting was deglaciation; land that had been covered by ice saw the light of day again, after about 20,000 years.
The third way a glacier wasted involved large-scale stoppage of ice movement, leaving large parts of the glacier stranded, sometimes over broad, mainly upland areas, detached from the main body of still-actively-flowing ice on surrounding lowlands (the plains surrounding Turtle Mountain, for example). In North Dakota, this was important over upland places like the Missouri Coteau and Turtle Mountain. Areas of “stagnant,” or “dead” ice on the uplands then continued to melt slowly. Landforms resulting from the melting of such stagnant ice are distinctive and much different from those that were constructed during the step-wise retreat of active glacial ice I described earlier.
Much of North Dakota’s modern landscape reflects its latest encounter with glaciers during the Ice Age. While glaciers flowed into and over the state, carrying the pulverized rock and soil debris they had picked up along their routes, they sheared off old bedrock landforms, smeared on new layers of sediment, and built new landforms. They filled old river valleys with sediment at the same time rivers of meltwater were flowing from the glaciers carving new valleys. In some places, the glacial ice forced existing rivers to follow different routes; in other places it completely obliterated and concealed what had been rivers and valleys. Cold winds blowing over sand that had earlier been deposited on floodplains and in lakes built dunes and spread a veneer of silt (loess) over much of the state.
Most of the sediment associated with the action of glaciers of the most-recent glaciation is soft. It is “unconsolidated,” and does not hold together well (you can dig it with a shovel). An exception: earlier glaciers also deposited sediment. Nearly all of this earlier sediment has eroded away, but in those places where we have found it exposed, or drilled into it, it may be cemented. A jackhammer may be more appropriate than a shovel for digging in such cemented deposits. However, the softer, looser materials that form most North Dakota glacial deposits are much more common. Sediments related to glaciation in North Dakota can be grouped into three main types: till, lake sediment, and outwash.
1. Till was deposited directly from the ice, mostly in the form of mud flows, which slumped or flowed into their current position as the ice melted. Till consists of silty, sandy, pebbly clay, as well as cobbles, or even large boulders.
2. Lake sediment is layered material that was deposited in lakes, which formed on and near the glacier. Such sediment consists mainly of layers of fine-grained silt and clay, deposited on lake floors, along with some sand and gravel, which collected as beaches along the shores of lakes , many of which were dammed by glaciers.
3. Outwash consists of material deposited by running water. Some outwash may be cemented into a kind of stony concrete, but most of it is loose sand and gravel that was washed out of the melting glacier (hence the name “outwash”). Outwash was deposited by streams and rivers flowing through meltwater valleys or as broad, often nearly level sheets of sand ahead of a melting glacier.
Where they are present, sediments deposited directly by glaciers, and by wind and water associated with glaciation, form a thick covering on top of much of the preglacial (bedrock) surface. In central North Dakota, in Sheridan County, the glacial sediment is over 700 feet thick in places. Ten miles northwest of Tolley in northwestern Renville County, it is at least 800 feet thick, the thickest I can document in the state. The amount and thickness of glacial sediment can vary considerably over short distances so it is likely that even thicker deposits than I mentioned exist in places. Over much of the glaciated part of the state, the glacial materials average 150 feet thick.
At any given location, the glacial deposits may consist of two or more layers of till, interbedded with lake beds, alluvial sediments or other materials. In some places, soils, which had developed on the surface of an earlier glacial, river, lake, or wind-blown deposit, were buried when a new layer of glacial material was deposited. These old, buried soils (paleosols) were formed during long intervals of weathering and exposure, like the one we are enjoying now. Paleosols are among the best indicators in the geological record for multiple episodes of glaciation during the Ice Age. The characteristics of a paleosol also help us understand the climatic conditions (forest or grassland, wet or dry, cool or warm, etc.) at the time it formed.
The best places to see several multiple layers of glacial deposits in North Dakota are near Riverdale, at the Wolf Creek inlet to Lake Sakakawea in McLean County and in Beulah Bay, about 15 miles north of the town of Beulah in Mercer County. In both locations, two and, in some places, three discrete till units, separated by cemented gravel layers or paleosols, are being eroded by waves along the lake.
Drill-hole data in eastern and southeastern North Dakota provide evidence that at least a half dozen glacial advances have occurred there since the Ice Age began. Parts of southwestern North Dakota were glaciated during some of the earlier glaciations, but (apart from some rare exceptions) glacial landforms are not found there today because they were eroded away long ago. Glacial lake sediments and river gravels containing glacially derived materials can be found as far southwest as Dickinson and near the Killdeer Mountains, and I have tentatively identified patches of hard, cemented till and glacial river gravels near Bowman and Rhame, places usually considered never to have been glaciated.
Modern soils are an important link to our geologic past. Fresh glacial deposits consist of a mixture of materials, and, because their sources are so varied, they provide the combination of nutrients necessary for fertile soil. In the glaciated part of the state, North Dakota’s soils consist of the weathered exterior of materials left by glacial action. In the thousands of years that have elapsed since the ice sheets disappeared, constantly changing climate, physical and chemical weathering, accumulation of prairie and woodland plant litter, development of root systems, and burrowing activity by organisms have all contributed to the transformation of glacial deposits into the rich soils that form the basis for much of our agricultural wealth.
Glaciers in North Dakota: Part One
Glaciers are giant bodies of ice, formed from snow that survives from year to year. Accumulations of snowfall from past years compact into a substance called firn, a recrystallized residue of snow left over from past seasons. During the summers, when temperatures are warm enough for rain instead of snow, the rainfall adds to the mass of a glacier, eventually freezing and becoming part of the glacier. With time and additional snow cover, the whole mass gradually solidifies into hard ice: a glacier.
The color of pure glacial ice, if it is clear and lacking the various rocks and sediments often found in glaciers, is ice-blue. Drop a piece of glacial ice into a glass of warm water and it may literally “explode.” Any air trapped in the ice, thousands of years ago, and pressurized by the great overlying weight of the glacier, escapes with force from the piece of ice as it melts in the glass. By analyzing these trapped pockets of air, scientists can learn what our atmosphere consisted of in the past.
When an ice mass becomes thick enough and heavy enough to flow, it “officially” becomes a true glacier. A glacier flows slowly away from the place where it is thickest. It may flow at a few feet a year although, in some circumstances, the flow rate may be much faster. In the northern hemisphere, glaciers expand mainly southward, away from polar regions because the temperatures to the south are warmer than to the north. A glacier flows most easily when it is warmer and less brittle. It will move much faster at 30 degrees F. than at minus 30 degrees F.
A glacier doesn’t glide placidly over the land. It scratches and grinds the underlying bedrock surface, picking up pieces of rock and soil, dragging them along and using them as tools to scour the ground beneath the ice.
Glaciers don’t normally flow uphill, but they do fill lowlands and overtop them, much like flood water.
Glaciers in mountainous areas, unlike broad ice sheets in places like Greenland and Antarctica, come with a sense of “scale.” The mountain peaks in the distance and the valley walls that hold the glacier help you to orient yourself. But suppose you are standing on a snow-covered, continental-size glacier (dressed in a heavy parka). You see nothing but frozen wasteland, nothing but whiteness. No buildings, no fences, no trees, no landmarks. Only emptiness. No sound but the wind. On a cloudy day, sky and ice blend; making it nearly impossible to distinguish the horizon marking their boundary.
The most-recent major glacial episode in North Dakota is referred to as the Wisconsinan glaciation. It began approximately 90,000 years ago and ended 11,500 years ago, but glacial conditions were not continuous during that entire time. An initial pulse of glaciation (the Early Wisconsinan, 90,000 to 70,000 years ago), was followed by withdrawal of the ice, which was probably complete by 65,000 years ago. Between 65,000 and 35,000 years ago, North Dakota’s climate alternated between combinations of warmer, wetter, cooler, and drier periods, much as it does today. Then, about 30,000 years ago, a second major pulse of glaciation, the Late Wisconsinan, began. The Late Wisconsinan glacier reached its maximum extent between 18,000 and 16,000 years ago when it covered all but the southwestern part of the state. The position of the Missouri River approximates the maximum extent of the Late Wisconsinan glacier. Active glaciers melted completely from the state by 11,500 years ago.
By the time each glacier advanced, the land ahead of it may have become deeply frozen permafrost and, as the ice moved over the frozen rock and soil, it picked up chunks of these materials, incorporating them into the glacier itself. In the areas where it formed, west of Hudson Bay, the materials beneath the thickening ice were mainly crystalline igneous and metamorphic rocks such as granite and gneiss. Farther south, the glaciers flowed over layers of sedimentary rock. Whatever the ice flowed over, it picked up some of it and carried it along.
A moving glacier may be likened to a huge excavation and grading machine that does its job of eroding by plucking and abrasion. Plucking, the more important of the two, is based on a freeze-thaw cycle. The cycle begins when downward pressure melts the ice at the base of a glacier. Water seeps into cracks in the rock beneath the glacier. When the water freezes, the expanding ice plucks rock fragments and incorporates them into the debris near the base of the glacial ice.
After a glacier covers an area for a while, and a considerable thickness of ice lies on the land, the materials beneath a glacier gradually thaw, a combined result of the pressure of the overlying ice and the natural upward flow of heat from the Earth’s interior. The ground surface beneath the North Dakota glaciers was not frozen, and the base of a glacier may have been a muddy mass. This facilitated even more sediment being incorporated into the base of the moving ice.
In some places ground water in the saturated sediments beneath the heavy weight of the glacier built up great pressures due to the weight of the overlying ice.
Besides transforming materials beneath the ice into a mud-like mixture, the water, because it was pressurized, tended to force — squeeze–the sub-glacial sediments upward, into the base of the moving glacier. Sediments beneath the ice were smeared out as they were carried along with the advancing mass of ice.
A glacier seldom behaves like a bulldozer, pushing debris ahead of it. It does, however, incorporate debris as it moves by freezing it onto its base. In whatever way the boulders, gravel, sand, silt, and clay beneath a glacier became part of the moving glacier mass, both ice and sediment flowed forward and the farther the glacier traveled, the more material it accumulates. Glaciers advanced over North Dakota several times, and each time, when they melted, they dropped their entire load of rock and sediment, material gathered from places previously overridden. Some of the material carried by the glacier ended up far from where it had originated. We find rocks in North Dakota that came from northern Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario. We also find chunks of shale that came from only a few dozen feet away. The sediment a glacier was carrying finally came to rest when the last ice melted.
During the active life of a glacier, every crystal of ice, every boulder, sand grain and fragment of rock within the ice, is moving, slowly making its way away from the center of snow and ice accumulation.
In North Dakota, the movement was generally southward, away from the Keewatin center of ice accumulation west of Hudson Bay. Apart from its overall southward progress, variations in the topography over which the glacier advanced locally affected the direction of flow.
When the glaciers that covered much of North Dakota eventually melted, all of the material they had been carrying was laid down on the land surface where the glacier had been. This included everything from large boulders (erratics) to fine-grained material: sand, silt, and clay. This “glacial sediment,” deposited directly from the melting ice, is known as “till.” Till was deposited as a kind of stony mud that eventually dried out after the glacier melted away. Usually, the till amounted to a few tens of feet of material, but after several glaciations, it might have accrued to several hundred feet: the materials from several glaciations, stacked one on top of another.
Glaciation was the main geologic influence on much of North Dakota’s landscape. The Ice Age, a time geologists also refer to as the Pleistocene Epoch, includes most of the past three million years of geologic time. Glaciers advanced over the northern plains several times during the Ice Age, reaching northern and eastern North Dakota. When it wasn’t glaciated, the state had a climate much like the one we enjoy today or possibly even milder at times. the Ice Age wasn’t one long “deep-freeze.”
During their studies of the geology of the state, geologists have found evidence for at least seven separate glaciations, but there may have been more. The most recent of these glaciations is known as the Wisconsinan (because deposits typical of that glaciation are widespread in Wisconsin). The Wisconsinan glaciation began about 100,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago. Some geologists debate whether the Ice Age has really ended yet. After all, large areas of the earth’s surface are still covered by extensive glaciers (Greenland, Antarctica, etc.). It’s likely that we are currently enjoying a lull between major glaciations.
Even though North Dakota was glaciated many times during the Ice Age, it is the Wisconsinan glacial deposits, the most recent ones, that are most obvious to us. These are the ones that form the hills and valleys in eastern and northern North Dakota and they are the ones in which our prairie potholes and wetlands are developed. Most of our richest farmland is developed on the Wisconsinan glacial surface.
Early glaciers, which advanced into North Dakota before the Wisconsinan glacier, also had a profound effect on the state. The materials they deposited have been largely eroded away, and about all that remains of them are occasional boulders — “erratics.” I will discuss erratics elsewhere. It was an early glacier that diverted the course of the Little Missouri River eastward more than 640,000 years ago (possibly earlier). Before that time, the Little Missouri River flowed northward into Canada. In fact, all of North Dakota used to be drained by rivers that flowed into Canada. When it was diverted, the Little Missouri River began to carve the badlands we see today.
All of us who have traveled around North Dakota know that the landscape varies considerably from place to place. Southwestern North Dakota, with its badlands, buttes, and broad vistas is largely the result of hundreds of thousands of years of erosion. The landscape there is not glacial. It has been carved from layers of flat-lying sandstone and other materials.
The Missouri River marks an approximate boundary between the eroded landscape of southwestern North Dakota and the entirely different glacial landscape north and east of the river, where we see small hills – small at least compared to large buttes like Sentinel Butte and Bullion Butte found in southwestern North Dakota. Eastern North Dakota is characterized by thousands of potholes, poorly developed drainage in places, and remarkably fertile farmland.
When the glaciers advanced over the state, they picked up some of the materials over which they flowed. The glaciers contained a variety of kinds of soil and rock, which they eventually deposited as thick layers of sediment. The exposed surface of these sediments has been weathered for the past several thousand years (since the glaciers melted) and it forms the rich soils our farmers work today.
Over much of eastern North Dakota, the glacial sediments were laid down as an undulating plain (think of the Carrington, Finley or Kenmare areas, for example). In other places, a more hilly landscape resulted (think of Turtle Mountain or the Missouri Coteau — places like Belcourt, Hurdsfield, Max, Ryder and countless others). In still other places, water from the melting glacier became ponded, forming huge lakes. Today, most of these areas are flat. Examples of the flat topography may be seen in places like Fargo, Hillsboro, Grand Forks or Grafton. The old floor of Glacial Lake Agassiz (the Red River Valley) is the classic example of flat. Hundreds of smaller glacial lake plains are found in North Dakota too.
As the glaciers flowed over North Dakota, they tended to smooth off and wear down the hill tops and fill in the lower areas with sediment. The overall result is a fairly level landscape. The layers of glacial sediment underlying that landscape are extremely complex, containing buried river channels, blocks of sandstone and shale, old landscapes that were covered many times by fresh glacial sediments. Buried layers of gravel and sand, deposited by water flowing from the melting glacial ice, constitute aquifers. They contain some of our best sources of fresh water.
As the ice flowed, in some places it picked up large chunks of material and moved them short distances before setting them down again. A good example of this is at Devils Lake, where a large amount of material was picked up and moved southward a few miles. Today, Devils Lake lies in a broad lowland. South of the lake is a high range of hills, including Sully’s Hill. The hills consist of materials that were once in the lowland where Devils Lake is now.
In some places, huge floods of water from melting glaciers carved deep river channels. Countless small meltwater valleys, along with some large ones too, are found throughout eastern and northern North Dakota. The Sheyenne, Souris, and James River valleys are good examples of large meltwater valleys. Valley City, Minot, and Jamestown are nestled in meltwater valleys. The Missouri River valley is another example of a glacial river channel, but it had such a complicated history that I’ll plan on writing a special article about it.
How thick were the glaciers that covered North Dakota? Certainly, they were more than a thousand feet thick in the east and north, so thick that the Earth’s crust beneath the ice buckled and sagged downward, eventually rebounding when the ice melted.
Who or what lived in North Dakota during the Ice Age? Mastodons and wooly mammoths lived along the edge of the glacier. Elk, caribou, and horses were common. Horses became extinct in North Dakota and in North America at the end of the Ice Age, They survived, worldwide, because they had migrated to Asia via the land bridge between North America and Asia prior to then. During my field work over the years, I’ve found mastodon teeth, caribou bones and, in the Lake Agassiz deposits, fossil fish bones, mainly perch. It’s likely that early humans also lived here while the most recent glacier was still melting.
I’ve mainly been discussing North Dakota’s glacial landscape. Part of the state, the southwest quarter, was not glaciated, but the glaciers also left their mark there. The badlands along the Little Missouri River owe their existence to early glaciers that diverted the river eastward from its northerly route into Canada. This diversion triggered greatly increased erosion by the Little Missouri River, which resulted in the formation of badlands. Some places that were not glaciated are marked by polygons, formed when permafrost froze the land beyond the limit of the glaciers.